Talk:Grenada dove

Birds Low‑importance

Grenada dove is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

Grenada Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Grenada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Grenada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GrenadaWikipedia:WikiProject GrenadaTemplate:WikiProject GrenadaGrenada articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bias in the article

The following The current uproar over development of the Mount Sanctuary is misplaced and misleading. The Grenada Dove is not adequately protected under current management plans. Funding and properly arranged conservation easements with money-generating entities such as resorts not only provide protection but also increase the opportunity for tourism within the Grenadian economy. Conservation efforts for this species will only work when the needs of all stakeholders are addressed. If the Grenada Dove is to continue to exist then individuals involved in its conservation must reevaluate current methods of preserving this species, stop perpetuating inaccurate data about the species, and seek alternatives that are win-win for both the Grenada Dove and the Grenadian people is not neutral or unbiased and reads like a press statement from the developers. This article has undergone numerous edits from anonymous IPs from both sides of the debate. Wikipedia is not a battleground or a soapbox. There seems to be a lot of info that has been added to this and that is great but we need to make this article neutral and balanced. Sabine's Sunbird talk 05:44, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Many statements in the 'current issues' section need proper referencing as well as neutralising the tendentious language. There are also inline references throughout the article that are not expanded or mentioned in the list of references. Maias 06:46, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed some blatantly POV statements but it still needs plenty of work. Maias 10:14, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]